AI agents run your tasks and processes.
You approve what matters
Your people and agents work together in one system — while you manage it all from one place.
The context lives
in your head
You keep passing context between tools, teammates, and agents — then chasing updates just to know where things stand.
The company moves as fast as you can answer
Questions and decisions keep coming back to you. When you can't answer, the work waits.
Someone still has to keep everything up to date
Tasks move and processes change, but trackers and docs don't update themselves. Soon, neither reflects what's actually happening.
What changes with Standi:
- Context stays in one place, shared across agents and teammates.
- Work keeps moving until your input is needed.
- Statuses and process docs stay current as the work changes.
You stay in control without coordinating every step.
Describe the process in plain words — agents run it, step by step
Paste your process doc — or describe it the way you'd brief a new hire. That text becomes a living process: agents run it as written, and editing is a conversation. When a step stalls, you hear about it first — not your client.
Assign a task — people and agents work on it together
A task carries everything it needs — an owner, a deadline, a result, and the context. Assign one, and the assignee's agent preps it before they open it: context gathered, a draft attached. Nobody starts from zero.
Say it once. It lands in the right task or process
"Client asked to move the deadline." "We agreed on $4K." Tell your agent — in Telegram or in the app — and it files each into the right task or process. And you can always ask it where things stand.
Set a goal — your agent moves the work toward it
Your agent keeps the goal in view: it proposes and prioritizes the tasks that move it, and posts a written status every day — the one you'd otherwise assemble yourself out of Slack, the tracker and your memory.
Place the control points — nothing important happens without your approval
AI drives the work to the result — and you place the control points: gates anywhere in a process, nothing external without your approval, everything attributed, one brake that pauses it all instantly.
Bring your favorite agents
Claude Code, Codex, hosted by us — use any. Swap an agent in a second; the role and its work stay. On your own subscriptions — we don't resell tokens.
Companies are self-improvement loops. Yours get an engine.
The best modern companies run as recursive improvement loops — ship, learn, rewrite the playbook, ship again (YC on how top startups compound). In Standi the loop is built in: every run of a process generates the lesson, and the lesson lands back into the SOP itself — through the same gates and versions as any other change. Nothing rewrites itself behind your back.
Your procedures get better every time they run. That's the compounding nobody's stack does today.
$100 /month per seat
BETAafter a 14-day free trial
- Flat. No credits, no per-task counters, no bill that grows because the month was busy.
- Your AI runs on your own subscriptions. Zero token markup.
- No card to start.
So now I babysit an AI?
That's the fear the last tool earned: you automated it, and then checked every output anyway. Here the agent can't approve its own gates; anything external waits for you — as a short card with the context, decided in about a minute. Everything is attributed, and the brake stops it all instantly. Babysitting is what happens without structure.
Do I need to be technical?
If you can brief a new hire, you can run Standi. No canvas, no JSON, no node that errors at 7am on a Monday. Plain language in, running process out.
What can it access?
Exactly what the person it works for can — no shadow permissions. Connections via a standard Connect page, one by one, when the process needs them; never a password in chat.
What does it cost?
$100/month per seat (USD), flat — after a 14-day free trial. On your own AI subscriptions, zero token markup. No credits to count, no per-task math, nothing that grows because the month was busy.
Isn't this just MCP with a task manager?
MCP connects one agent to its tools. Standi is the place where several people and their agents work in the same tasks and processes — one shared structure with gates, shared context and named ownership, running on the subscriptions you already pay for. MCP is one of the wires; the structure is the product.
I already run everything in Claude Code — why add this?
Claude Code is one person's session. Standi makes it a team: teammates and their agents work in the same tasks with full context, anything external waits at your gate — and the structure survives any agent swap. When a better agent ships next quarter, you swap it in and lose nothing.
Start with one process
Describe the process that keeps landing back on your desk — the way you'd brief a new hire — and watch it run. Fourteen days of free trial is enough to set up your first process and see it work.
Tell us about the process that keeps landing back on your desk — the form takes 90 seconds.
YOU'RE IN
GOOD FIT SIGNALS
Good fit signals. We'll email you within a day — either to start your onboarding or with two questions we still have.
NOT QUITE YET
Standi works best when a recurring process with real volume already runs through you and you're ready to let AI drive it between your approvals. From what you've told us, we'd probably not earn our $100 yet — and we'd rather tell you that now than after a disappointing month. We've added you to the list for {self-serve access / when we support earlier-stage setups}; if a process starts piling up on your desk, reply to any email from us and we'll jump.
SELF-SERVE WAITLIST
You're in — we'll open self-serve access to you as the first wave finishes onboarding.